Key Difference
Both products are model driven No Code platforms. Compared to Kintone, Nocoly offers more advanced product features and provides highly granular configuration options for many functions. This allows customers to implement complex application logic without relying on coding skills. Many functionalities that require additional plugins in Kintone are built-in capabilities in Nocoly HAP. This ability to take users through the final mile is crucial for building enterprise-grade applications.
Nocoly’s product interface design is more modern and adheres to WCAG standards. In comparison, Kintone’s templated interface feels outdated and offers a less optimal user experience.
In terms of deployment options, Nocoly not only provides SaaS services but also supports fully private deployments, offering flexible one-time purchase pricing models. Kintone, on the other hand, only offers a SaaS service model.
Key differentiations
- Key differentiations
SaaS and on any cloud
Highly granular configuration options
SaaS only
Deployment Model
- Deployment Model
SaaS rental, On Premise and all public cloud
SaaS only
Targeted Market
- Targeted Market
Medium to large enterprise
Small to medium
Targeted Builder
- Targeted Builder
Business users
Professional Implementers
Business users
Professional Implementers
Data volume
- Data volume
1 million for standard edition, unlimited for pro edition.
Only 50K per app
Languages for development UI
- Languages for development UI
English
Simplifed Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Japanese
For user created app, custom languages can be added.
Same
Pricing
- Pricing
Starting from $49 * 20 user per year (server), and $150 * 5 user per year (SaaS)
Provide buy-out option for server edition
Start from $ 240 * 5 user per year. (SaaS)
About Nocoly HAP Comparison
Creating competitor comparison documents is challenging for any brand, and we face similar pressure.
Feature-by-feature checklists are often ineffective, as most mature products offer comparable features. However, it’s the granularity and depth of these features that truly differentiate them. Diving into such details, though, risks turning the comparison into a technical paper, which still may not tell the full story. Ultimately, the best way to help users decide is through hands-on experience.
While platforms like Gartner, G2, or Capterra provide lists of options and customer reviews, we feel it’s not a fair playing field for Nocoly HAP as a newly launched product.
We also recognize that comparison charts created by any vendor will never be fully objective. Vendors naturally highlight their strengths and downplay their weaknesses. While understandable, this doesn’t help buyers make informed decisions.
That’s why we’re taking a different approach with this document. We’re starting with a high-level overview of the positioning and key characteristics of various products, presenting a basic fact sheet. We’ll then open the document to future customers, particularly those switching from other products, to add their comments and notes. Their insights will reveal the core differences between their previous solutions and Nocoly HAP.
We believe this approach will make the comparison chart more informative and as objective as possible.